After publishing a series pertaining to inmates who committed suicide while serving their time in the San Diego County Jail for the San Diego City Beat, freelance journalist Kelly Davis was approached several times to discuss the release of her research. "For the period of 2007 through 2012, San Diego County had the highest mortality rate than any other large county in California,” Davis said. Upon reviewing "How many inmate deaths is too many?" and the tragic circumstances that were covered about the terrible conditions of the convicts, it is no wonder why the city would want to protect it's reputation. Although it was requested that the charges be dismissed, one Judge had opposing views and claimed that "the county should have been on alert by news reports and anecdotes surrounding jail deaths." The Judge also noted that "Davis’ stories had put the county on notice about its 'inadequate suicide prevention policies and training' and that her exposé had revealed a 'pattern of constitutional violations' by jail personnel.'"
Davis was later interviewed by NBC 7 Investigates about her harassment from the court. She told reports that she was "terrified" and "shaking" due to the suffocation of a supposed legal obligation that she had to giving her work away. She figured that all of the attention she had gained had to be a form of intimidation. She then told NBC 7 Investigates that her team will be arguing that "this information is available from other sources." Meaning that all if the information that she possessed was secondary, and that there is no need for them to hover her. There was an instance where the court recognized their possible logic flaws with ruling a court order. According to the NBC 7 Investigates, “It is plausible that if the County had reacted to the prior suicide incidents by implementing an appropriate suicide prevention policy or by remedying the alleged custom of indifference, Kris’s (an inmate of San Diego County) suicidal ideations would not have been ignored,” which was stated in the Judge's ruling. But Davis's opening claim in her interview, "These are all human beings worthy of redemption.", highlights the personal rights of not only the knowledge of her audience but of the inmates being avenged after their traumas.
Since this case also shows conflict within the freedom of press, it should be common knowledge that a reporter has certain liberties when receiving and distributing information. Although the city could have felt threatened or could have been discontented from the possible damage, there is not much they can do about public information being brought forth. Davis included in her statement that “you want journalists to be free to do their stories and to gather their research, talk to their sources, without worrying that someone is looking over their shoulder”.